The Revenue Rule: Is It Relevant Any More?

Jack Townsend has yet another post about the tax crimes of tax "havens".

He quotes a previous post of his:

Of course, the reason Tax Haven jurisdictions have no such treaty provisions (they wouldn’t be Tax Haven jurisdictions if they did) is to avoid such treaty information sharing provisions and tax debt collection provisions. 

Once again, Jack shows how he is pandering to whatever Democrat gets selected President, and he is showing how well he can spin his beloved parties lies, which would be a primary requirement for the party of slavery.

First of all, the US is far and away the worlds largest tax haven:

Keep up the lies and distortion Jack, Hillary is bound to notice your talents.   If not, perhaps Bernie will.  And too bad you didn't bundle enough contributions for that Nobel Peace Prize winner Barry "choom gang" Obama.  If you had you might have ended up as Secretary of Commerce like that mammoth tax cheat with IRS immunity named Penny Pritzker.  I guess you'll just have to keep peddling IRS lies until the next Democrat administration sees your talent.

Second of all, when the IRS acted like the mafioso that they are, and forced the Swiss banks to hand over detailed information on the transactions and banking recipients of all cash transfers by US tax donkeys out of Model 1, 2 and 3 Swiss banks, the IRS conveniently exempted transfers to US tax haven and tax crime banks.  In this way deep state operatives like Penny Pritzker could simply be tipped off that if they got their money out of the Swiss bank and into a US bank, they would escape under the radar of the IRS and they could simply declare any income from that capital on that years income tax form and become instantly compliant.  They also accomplished another goal, getting that capital back onshore before the Fatca capital controls shut down all international banking for US tax slaves.   Bravo IRS, but the poor US tax slaves are slowly waking up to this Lois Lerner "dog ate my emails" type of corruption.  See Here.

The private banking subsidiary of Societe Generale SA in Switzerland conceded in its comparison with the US Department of Justice that they, installations of American customers to "private and corporate accounts at other banks in Switzerland, Hong Kong, Israel, Lebanon Liechtenstein and Cyprus "have transferred. Banque Pasche SA declared in the comparison, funds were transferred to banks in Israel and Hong Kong "in an attempt to escape the discovery further."

Third of all,  the Obama administration coerced the Swiss government into signing a model 2 IGA in which they were forced to forgo all reciprocity from the IRS in order to avoid completely shredding the Swiss constitution.  Again, the US never had jurisdiction to do this and was acting in a willfully illegal fashion.  But what do the criminal IRS or Jack Townsend care about law when the law gets in their way.

This coercion is very reminiscent of the oath required of US slave person-hood renunciants who not only are extorted into paying $2350.00 to buy their freedom, and forced to take an oath stating that they were not coerced into renunciation, when in fact, it is the very same IRS that is coercing virtually every US person-hood renunciant into their renunciation.  It is like the IRS forcing the poor tax slaves to dig their own grave and then forcing them to sign a statement that they weren't coerced before executing them.

Bravo federaltaxcrimes for telling another whopping turd of a lie.